What is the situational judgement test?
A situational judgement test (SJT) is a measurement method designed to assess judgement in work-relevant situations. The Scientist Training Programme SJT has been developed by researchers from the Work Psychology Group (WPG), in collaboration with those working across healthcare science roles. It maps closely to the person specification for an STP trainee and explores values, behaviours, and professionalism, measuring target attributes including:
- empathy and compassion
- professional integrity
- team collaboration
The questions are developed to provide insight into how well an individual is suited to the role of a Trainee Clinical Scientist. SJTs are frequently used for recruitment purposes and research has shown that SJTs have significant validity in predicting job performance.
During the assessment applicants are presented with a set of hypothetical scenarios that they may encounter at work and asked to make judgements about possible responses on a scale from 1 = Very Appropriate, to 5 = Very Inappropriate. Responses are then scored against a pre-determined answer key.
Is there a time limit for the SJT?
You will have 50 minutes to complete the test, within the testing window. The timer will start with the first question and will be visible on the screen during the test.
If you require a specific reasonable adjustment to enable completion of the SJT, this must have been indicated on your application form and evidence to support the request provided. You must wait for confirmation that your reasonable adjustment request has been granted before starting the SJT. Click this link for information on reasonable adjustment requests.
The structure of the SJT
During the SJT you will be presented with 25 hypothetical scenarios, relevant to someone working in healthcare science. For each scenario there will be a number of hypothetical responses (between 3 and 8) which you will need to consider and rate. In total there are 146 responses to consider and rate.
For each scenario, you will be asked to rate the appropriateness of a series of responses to the scenario, using the following scale.
|1 – Extremely appropriate||An option is an extremely appropriate thing to do in response to the scenario and aligns exactly with what is expected of a trainee scientist.|
|2 – Slightly Appropriate||An option is a slightly appropriate thing to do in response to the scenario. It is somewhat aligned with what is expected of a trainee scientist.|
|3 – Neither appropriate nor inappropriate||An option is neither appropriate nor inappropriate if the option does not oppose or align with what is expected of a trainee scientist.|
|4 – Slightly Inappropriate||An option is a slightly inappropriate thing to do in response to the scenario. It is somewhat opposed to what is expected of a trainee scientist.|
|5 – Extremely Inappropriate||An option is an extremely inappropriate thing to do in response to the scenario and directly opposes what is expected of a trainee scientist.|
Considering your answers
You should consider your answers from the viewpoint of being the Trainee Scientist. Think about what the Trainee Scientist should do in the given scenario, rather than what you may be likely to do. Consider each response independently from the other responses presented within the scenario. For example, a response does not need to resolve all aspects of the scenario to be ‘1 = Very Appropriate’.
Within a single scenario, each rating can be used more than once or not at all. For example, all responses within a scenario can be given the same rating of ‘1= Very Appropriate’ if you feel that this is the correct rating for each response. Please give your best answer based on the information provided in each scenario.
The response options provided within a scenario are not intended to represent all possible options. It may be that the response you think would be the most appropriate is not present. Remember that you are required to make a judgement about the options that are provided. For example, if the wrong lab result is provided to a patient, there are a number of steps that should be taken, including checking the patient is okay and re-assessing the patient’s treatment plan. The response ‘ask the patient if they are okay’, should still be judged as appropriate. It should not be judged as if this is the only action that was taken.
It may be that some options are appropriate in the short term (i.e. immediately addressing a wrongdoing) and some options are appropriate in the long term (i.e. discussing the implications of the wrongdoing after the event). Please consider the appropriateness of a response option irrelevant of the timeframe.
Marks are given based on how close an answer is, to the correct answer. There is no negative marking and you should therefore attempt all questions.
Preparing for the SJT
You can access the 2023 sample test prior to completing the actual assessment via the Pearson VUE website.
Use the sample test to familiarise yourself with the format, navigation and question types. This will include the desired response options for the sample questions and a rationale to explain why that is the correct rating.
Your SJT result
You will not get the result of your SJT on completion of the test but it will show as ‘completed’ on your Pearson VUE account. No ‘completed’ result will appear in your Oriel account.
Scoring of the SJTs will take place once the test window closes. All SJT results will be released on Oriel by the ‘longlist release’ deadline.
If you are successful, your application status in Oriel will show as ‘longlisted’ and the next stage is shortlisting. However, this does not guarantee you an allocation to interview.
If you have not scored sufficiently and are unsuccessful, your application status in Oriel will show as ‘longlist unsuccessful’ and your application will not progress any further.