Your submission will be assessed by an assessment panel that will take a view on a provisional pass/fail outcome following review of your reflective narrative, supporting evidence and panel interview.
Your critical reflective narrative
Please provide your critical reflective narrative explaining how your development as a Clinical Scientist demonstrates your readiness to transition into practice in each of the five domains of the Academy of Healthcare Science Good Scientific Practice (GSP) guide (2021). This is available from the AHCS website.
GSP Domains – you may choose and emphasise the elements of the domains that you consider to be most relevant to central aspects of your role. Your self-advocacy must acknowledge the current scope of your practice. If you believe any parts of the scope of your practise have been adversely affected by Covid-19, please make it clear in your narrative and provide supporting evidence. It would also be helpful if you can provide a training plan (optional) to demonstrate how you plan to address any gaps.
Global statement: as a Clinical Scientist, you will be more than the sum of your parts. In the last section of your narrative please provide a summary of how you intend to use the insights and new perspectives gained from your critical reflections to transition into practice as a patient-focused and safe, newly-qualified, threshold entry Clinical Scientist on your entry to the workplace as a registered professional.
As a Clinical Scientist you are expected to be reflective practitioner. “Reflection is a process which helps you gain insight into your professional practise…” (HCPC, 2021).
We suggest that you read Driscoll’s model of reflection (2018), which is a simple 3 stage model that will help you to synthesise your learning on the STP.
We recommend that you attend the ‘Trainee workshop on reflective writing for the IACC’ which is available on 25th, 27th and 28th April 2022. You can book a place on any of these dates using this form.
Any evidence you cite in your critical narrative must be signed off in OneFile by the IACC submission date. You are expected to have all your completed competencies signed off and available for use in your critical reflective narrative.
You can also draw on additional evidence you have uploaded into OneFile. Examples include workplace assessments (e.g. DOPS, OCE, MSF and CBD), relevant evidence from your academic programme, and other forms of evidence from supervisors or third parties that recognise a contribution or skill you have made during your training.
Evidence is about you and your achievements, ie what you have done, achieved and learned. Please do not upload external documents such as standard operating procedures or processes.
You should cite evidence that is relevant, proportionate and persuasive in supporting your narrative. You should be able to explain and justify any significant gaps in your evidence and how you will practise safely within this current scope of practise.
How to cite evidence
The syntax for citing competencies and workplace assessments (DOPS, OCE and CBD) in your narrative is shown in the examples below.
- To cite competency 3 in module SCC110 (Introduction to Healthcare Science and Clinical Leadership) use SCC110:3.
- To cite a workplace assessment please use the module code and the assessment code e.g. SLS100:OCE1 (Clinical Biochemistry Investigation of Major Organ Function, OCE1).
- Reference to your training plan, if relevant and you have chosen to include one, should be to the version in the annex in your narrative.
Using unsigned evidence of critical reflection
You may refer to unsigned submissions within your e-portfolio to demonstrate your developing critical reflective practice. Assessors will not consider references to unsigned submissions for the purpose of determining your recognition of the scope of your own practise. Examples of citing unsigned evidence:
- unsigned SCC110:3
- unsigned SLS100:OCE1
Assessors will focus on the profile of evidence you have cited from your portfolio and the context within which you have cited it, including your optional training plan.
Citations do not count towards the 3500 word limit for your narrative.
Training plan annex (optional)
We recommend that you include a training plan as an annex at the end of your critical reflective narrative that outlines how you intend to address any significant Covid related gaps in your portfolio. You can use your current training plan which would allow the assessment panel to view your training plan at the time of your submission while still allowing you to continue to use and update your plan during the assessment period. View our guidance on what is expected in your training plan.
A training plan is optional and the appendix will not count towards the 3500 word limit for your narrative.
The marking criteria describe the qualitative aspects the assessors will look for in your critical reflective narrative in assessing your readiness to practise. Please familiarise yourself with these.
You must use the most recent version of the MS Word submission template for your critical reflective narrative. You must use the current edition of the AHCS Good Scientific Practice Guide (2021) when referring to the GSP domains.
Submitting your narrative
You will be sent a link (and username and password details) two weeks before the submission deadline to the online system where you must upload your critical reflective narrative. In addition to these login credentials, you will also receive a simple step-by-step guide showing you how to upload and submit your MS Word document.
The submission system will be open for the two week period immediately prior to the submission deadline and will close on the deadline. You can upload newer versions of your critical reflective narrative up until the deadline – i.e. the latest submission before the deadline will be the one which is assessed.
Essential information and documents
You can download all the information you need about this assessment from the Independent Assessment of Clinical Competence page under the ‘Essential information and documents’ section.
You will be invited to attend a 45 minute interview to discuss your critical reflective narrative. We will notify you of the date of your interview at least six weeks in advance. The notification will be sent to your work email address held on record by the School. Please make sure your contact details are up to date. If you have not received notification of the date and time of the panel interview, please email firstname.lastname@example.org.
Due to the complexity of organising the interview panels and ensuring there are no conflicts of interest it is not possible to alter your interview date or allow you to change dates with another candidate. If you are unable to attend your interview you will need to wait until the next opportunity to take the IACC 2022. Click this link to view the dates. You must notify the School in advance and submit an Extenuating Circumstances application. Unfortunately, we cannot guarantee in advance that your application will be accepted.
The assessor panel
The assessor panel will comprise three specialist assessors one of whom will be appointed lead assessor. The Lead Assessor will lead the panel interview which will last 45 minutes. You need to follow any direction given by the Lead Assessor regarding the conduct of the panel.
The assessors will review your narrative and cited evidence and identify and agree aspects of your narrative they wish to discuss with you. In considering your reflective narrative the panel may take a view on the completeness and fullness of the evidence you have cited. The interview will take a semi-structured interview approach and each assessor will have the opportunity to ask you questions. The questions to determine readiness to practise will cover each of the five Good Scientific Practice domains and your global statement. You can ask for clarification where the meaning of any question is not sufficiently clear. You and the assessors may make reference to your training plan, if included, and cited evidence in OneFile. You may suggest to assessors where they can find additional, relevant evidence that supports your answers to any questions within your OneFile portfolio for assessors to consider.
After the interview, the panel meet to form a judgement on your readiness to practise after considering your written narrative, the supporting evidence, and your interview.
The assignment will be judged on a pass or fail basis.
The detailed marking criteria are available and you are expected to demonstrate your readiness to practise based on your critical reflective narrative and your interview. Please use these to check that your writing addresses the criteria for critical reflective writing, self-advocacy, patient safety and professional standards and supporting evidence.
You must pass each of the five Good Scientific Practice domains and the global statement and meet the summary criteria, that your are able to:
- work safely and effectively at the level of a newly qualified clinical scientist in your specialty
- ensure appropriate standards and patient safety are maintained at all times
- recognise the scope of your own readiness to practise as an autonomous professional and explain how you will self-regulate to maintain professional standards, including patient safety
If an incident occurs within the panel interview an incident report is usually created. You can initiate an incident report or it can be raised by the assessors, the invigilator, any Service User Representative observing the panel interview or a member of the School staff supporting the interview panel. All incident reports are submitted to the Examination Board for consideration.
The incident report will be a brief statement that describes the issue, any remedy or solution offered during the panel interview and any perceived impact on the assessment process.
If you are submitting an Incident Report please complete the incident report online form available here.
After the interview
After you have finished your interview we will sent you a short online evaluation form to complete asking about your experience of the technical and administrative aspects of the interview.
If you have any questions or concerns and want to provide any feedback and comments you may have about the process, you can submit your feedback in writing by emailing email@example.com within 2 days of your interview. Please use ‘IACC 2022 feedback’ in the subject line of your email.
Confirmation of results
The assessor panel makes a provisional recommendation of pass or fail on your assessment. These recommendations are considered by the Exam Board along with any incident reports and feedback from the members of the Board including observers, lead assessors and subject experts. The Exam Board may adjust some recommendations when taking this feedback into account.
The Ratification Board, including the External Examiner, considers recommendations from the Examination Board. The consideration assists the Head of the National School for Healthcare Science in deciding the ratified outcome for each trainee.
Notification of results
You will be notified of the outcome of your IACC 2022 by email, normally within seven working days of the Ratification Board. The notification is in the form of a candidate report from the Head of the National School for Healthcare Science and a copy is sent to your training officer. An indicative date for the release of results will be published on the School website.
If you do not receive your result within five days of the published date for release of results, please email the assessment team at firstname.lastname@example.org.
You have a maximum of three attempts to pass the STP final assessment within a two-year period. The two-year period starts with the date you first attempt the IACC 2022 and excludes any breaks from your training recognised by the School.
You will receive supportive, constructive feedback from the assessors that will advise you on the areas you need to address for your resit attempt. The feedback will address your readiness to practise and will be aligned to the marking criteria.
If any issues were not fully explored within the limited time available during the panel interview assessor feedback will aim to make clear which elements relate to the interview and which are relate to your written submission.
Trainee support calls
The School will contact you to offer a support call with a Training Programme Director (TPD). You can also contact the School to request support by emailing your request to email@example.com. Where practical the support call will include the Lead Assessor for your panel.
Support calls can be helpful where the meaning of the assessor feedback is unclear, or to discuss your approach to transition into practice or to resit the IACC 2022. We strongly advise you to attend a support call if you have to resit the IACC 2022.
If you are required to resit the IACC, you are normally expected to resit at the next available opportunity published on the School website. If you are taking a break from the STP approved by the School, you are not allowed to attempt the IACC during this break.
Applications to defer the IACC 2022
You can apply to defer the date for sitting or resitting your IACC 2022, using the Extenuating Circumstances Policy.
Any applications to defer an IACC 2022 assessment must be supported by independently verifiable documentary evidence of unavoidable circumstances that significantly and adversely affect your ability to engage with the IACC 2022 assessment process. Please apply early. Your application will be considered in confidence by a committee and not all applications to defer the IACC 2022 assessment are upheld.
In the situation where you are unable to sit your scheduled IACC due to unexpected and unforeseeable circumstances that arise at short notice you must inform the School as soon as possible. You will need to apply under the Exceptional Circumstances Policy. Please email firstname.lastname@example.org.
You will need to provide evidence to support your application. Typically you should use this policy between the submission deadline for your written submission and your interview date. You can also apply under this policy if you believe unexpected and unavoidable personal circumstances affected your performance during your interview. Any application needs to meet the requirements set out in the policy.
Appeals and complaints
If you wish to make a complaint or appeal against your ratified outcome for your assessment then you must use the appropriate policy, within the time limits of those policies.
Issues related to the delivery of assessment or the ratified outcome
Please submit a complaint if your issue relates to the delivery of the assessment where that delivery has adversely affected your assessment.
Please submit an appeal if your request relates to a review of the decision making leading to the ratified outcome of the IACC 2022, including discussion within Examination Boards and Ratification Boards. You may request the minute from each Board to assist in preparing an appeal; appeals against the academic judgment of the assessors will not be accepted.
Priority of complaints and appeals procedures
Where you raise both a complaint and an appeal, the complaint will take priority.
Time limit for submission of appeal or complaint
You must submit your appeal and/ or complaint within 10 days of publication of your result (candidate report). Please email your appeal or complaint to email@example.com with ‘IACC appeal’ or ‘IACC complaint’ in the subject line.
All Answers. (November 2018). Driscoll’s Model of Reflection. [online]. Available from: https://nursinganswers.net/reflective-guides/driscoll-model-of-reflection.php?vref=1 [Accessed 11 April 2022].